![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: France
Posts: 132
|
![]()
True Fernando, in my opinion, cabassets and morions generally weigh between 1kg and 1.6kg, it all depends on the quality of the manufacture. By comparing with my other pieces.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 413
|
![]()
Nice helmet , the weight of these can indeed vary a lot , the same goes for close helmets of this period they can vary from 2 kg to 7 kg
helmet for troopers produced in high numbers as these and as the lobster tail helmet were mostly not that heavy , but there are betters quality exceptions out there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]() Quote:
We should also consider that by ca. 1600, the improvements in firearms would have required heavy enough armor to reduce mobility and increase cost to unacceptable levels. Unless in the case of specialized units like siege troops who were expected to experience concentrated fire from larger-bore weapons like rampart rifles and falconets (as well as cannons) as they approached the walls of fortresses or cities. For most soldiers operating in the field, protection against secondary projectiles like shrapnel, and of course swords and other hand weapons, was considered sufficient. (keeping in mind, also, that for speed of fire, infantry muskets were typically loaded with unpatched balls so accuracy and velocity declined markedly after 50 m). Officers and others who could afford to purchase their own gear could of course opt for higher quality and more protection, hence the better-made and more substantial armors that we sometimes see. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: France
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Do you think this punch could be that of Munich?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|