![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Sorry to play the stubborn Thomas; i had the firm idea that such detail is not an infantry/cavalry dual option but that it is so designed to prevent the breastplate not to conflict with the horse saddle .. if i make myself understood. Does the caption of the example at the zeughaus altes museum mention that is for infantry ... or cavalry ?
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: France
Posts: 132
|
I don't know, but I think you're right. I had never thought about this detail, but it is consistent.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|