|
|
|
26th December 2019, 01:11 AM
|
#1 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
Good point Kronckew. This scabbard looks very Ottoman to me.
|
|
|
|
26th December 2019, 07:01 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Hello Marius
I think you're absolutely right. This is not Persia and moreover it is not Bukhara. My opinion is a very good Ottoman kard. My congratulations |
|
|
|
|
26th December 2019, 08:44 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
Thank you guys for your oppinions!
|
|
|
|
|
26th December 2019, 05:14 PM
|
#4 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
Another question for me: were the turquoise stones originally held in place by gold settings? There seem to be round discoloration on the ivory around the turquoise stones.
|
|
|
|
|
26th December 2019, 08:38 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
Quote:
there are no traces of gold anywhere; there are no visible grooves where the gold would have been inserted; gold mountings on hilts are more an Indian trait, not Ottoman. |
|
|
|
|
|
27th December 2019, 04:57 AM
|
#6 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
Well I'll agree that kundun technique is unique to India. But I have seen silver and gold mounts for Ottoman gems (and even for glass look alikes).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
