![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I think I'm going to disagree with this "dhapur keris" idea. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	A dhapur is set down in a pakem. A pakem is a guide that has been established by some sort of authority, usually a kraton, and that pakem sets down the ricikan for the particular dhapur. Just because a keris has a blade shape that is curved like a jambiyo blade does not mean that it can be called "Dhapur Jambiyo". Until we can find a pakem that sets forth the requirements for a keris to be named as "Dhapur Jambiyo" I feel that it would be wise to refer to this particular object in a different way than by using the word "dhapur". My personal take on it is that we have jambiyo-like keris, or a keris-like jambiyo. Until an agreeable pakem surfaces we do not have a Keris of Dhapur Jambiyo. We simply do not have the required authority to hand out dhapurs as it suits us. In my post #13 I mentioned esoteric and spiritual reasons for regarding something as a legitimate keris. Clearly that measure cannot apply in this case.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |