Frontier Arithmetic: The Afghan Jezail

Richard G · 15th August 2019, 12:51 PM

Other than EIC or locally made locks there is possibly, or probably,a third type of lock that can confuse the issue.
It is known the EIC purchased lesser quality arms for trading purposes, in Africa on the voyage out, and to customers in India etc.
How many, and how they were marked? - I don't know; but it is certainly a possibility that there were British made EIC 'style' locks, but not actually EIC owned, in circulation in India.
Regards
Richard
PS Harding says he does not know why the 'flaunched' balemark was used, but implies it may have strayed from the ownership mark on other EIC owned goods e,g. the lead seals on bales of cloth.

15th August 2019, 12:51 PM	#11
Richard G Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 409	Other than EIC or locally made locks there is possibly, or probably,a third type of lock that can confuse the issue. It is known the EIC purchased lesser quality arms for trading purposes, in Africa on the voyage out, and to customers in India etc. How many, and how they were marked? - I don't know; but it is certainly a possibility that there were British made EIC 'style' locks, but not actually EIC owned, in circulation in India. Regards Richard PS Harding says he does not know why the 'flaunched' balemark was used, but implies it may have strayed from the ownership mark on other EIC owned goods e,g. the lead seals on bales of cloth.