![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,994
|
![]()
I agree with everything Jean has written, and I would like to add a little.
For a pure Bugis blade the outstanding tell is that the blade cross section is hexagonal, the faces of the blade are wide and flat with a short, steep decline to the cutting edge. It is probable that in the hand, both the blade under discussion and Jean's blade would be classified as Segaluh, which is a West Javanese classification. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,994
|
![]()
True Jean, and this mix of historic association, and geographic location is a source of ongoing misunderstanding and confusion.
Most keris blades are classified in accordance with geographic point of origin, but the name of a geographic point of origin can also refer to an era. Many people choose to understand the classification name as an historic era, rather than as a location. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|