![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Should we separate objects of extraordinary cultural significance (i.e. Tim's Bill of Rights example) from more common things?
One man (culture's) treasure may be only a collectible to another. However, the Bill of Rights is, arguably, the most important document in US history. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,890
|
![]()
Exactly. I mean no disrespect in using that as an example. The royal palace treasures of some of the before mentioned west African countries could be seen in the same light. Some of these artifacts are in fairly ordinary peoples collections. Something to chew on. I am not giving any of my humble collection away
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,890
|
![]()
I found this stuff about the sticks and the man who took them. The whole thing is not nice. How these stick were singled out is a mystery to me. Perhaps the alleged dastardly nature of there taking is true. makes me wonder about some of my sticks. Ineresting that there is meaning to the shapes.
http://msn-list.te.verweg.com/2006-April/004927.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|