![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Cute piece indeed Ken,
I tell you what; Assuming this could be a real tiny cannon for whatever purpose we leave it in this forum for possible identification. If it results to be a toy or a non functional miniature, implicating that those proof marks are a fantasy, then we move it to the Miscellania forum, for different appreciation. Meanwhile, have you tried to blow through the barrel, checking if the air goes out by the touch hole ? Generally in toys or replicas it doesn't. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 22
|
![]()
I notice the piece is lathe turned and seperate lugs added on. So it seems to be a later piece rather than a more original method of manufacturing through casting; as far as which era it may be from.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 543
|
![]()
Hi All
Thanks for your opinions. I can blow through the barrel and out the touch hole, so it could be used Looking at it under a strong magnifying glass there is none of the circular markings going all the way round, sone near the touch hole though. So I do not think it was turned on a lathe I think the main barrel is cast. It does look like the lugs were soldered into the sides of the cannon rather than cast. As to weather this makes it a later piece I do not know. Mark you say British proof marks , well done if you can form an opinion from my terrible photography, if they are British have you any opinion on date. The cost was minimal and I have learned from what I have found out about signal guns so a nice buy either way. Regards to all. Ken |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Sundial cannon ?
A day late and a dollar short again.. sigh. Last edited by Rick; 7th April 2019 at 09:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 357
|
![]()
I have no idea of the age of that particular one but they do still make them and proof them for the miniature cannon shooting discipline in the UK.
https://www.mlagb.com/canon-section/ CC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Those are definitely London proof house marks. To date it look at the style- loosely based on an Armstrong rifled muzzle loader c.1850's maybe?
These proof marks are for shotguns, but you can sort of see similarities |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,159
|
![]()
Hi Ken,
As Fernando said, it could be a toy due to its tiny size. That being said,I think it could still be a miniature signal gun. Some were indeed diminutive and were used to signal the hour on ships, serve as alarm clocks of the day. Here's a wiki page with an example cannon like yours. If it were only a toy, I don't think it would have the English proofs like yours. Congratulations on the neat find! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundial_cannon Last edited by M ELEY; 7th April 2019 at 05:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Rather plausible, Mark.
The dimensions of that device are Height: 18 cm (7 ″); Diameter: 31 cm (12.2 ″); Ken's cannon looks proportional. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|