![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Thanks Carlos!
Quote:
![]() Quote:
I believe there is a tendency to underestimate the age of Luzon blades with monosteel blades. Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Bringing over the info kindly provided in the other thread:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Because of the overall styling and degree of craftsmanship shown (not only in the hilts carving) I would agree with your dating this piece to the end of the 19th century to early 20th century. Also as I forgot to mention earlier, the copper pin you ask about is most likely for decorative purposes only and that originally each individual flower both near the ferrule and butt cap would have held one.
Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Robert,
Quote:
BTW, have you come across any similar "maker's mark" on Luzon blades? Quote:
It certainly would look neat and be more in line with the horn hilts decorated with pins of silver/etc.; a copper pin may also be too soft to really secure a blade... It just seemed odd to me that only these 2 pins survived though. Maybe I should get a x-ray done to put that idea to rest... ![]() Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
It would seem a bit redundant to have a single soft copper pin go through the tang (weakening it by drilling) when it already extends completely through the hilt and butt plate and is then peened to secure the blade.
![]() ![]() ![]() Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Robert,
Quote:
Quote:
I'll report back when I manage to obtain sound results! Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
The final fitting the tang extends through before being peened looks a bit yellow in your photos as well, so you might want to have it checked at the same time as the pins.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
For comparison, I'm adding a regular Luzon blade from possibly the same period; the hilt is the same type as in Robert's example while the blade has a symmetrical bevel (i. e. no chisel grind). [Please excuse the poor pic quality. I traded it with a forumite a long time ago.]
BTW, this common plain hilt type always seems to have 7 facets (which is also reflected in the ferrule). The ornately-carved hilt has an octagonal ferrule as well as pommel plate though; also the neighboring flowers number 8. Regards, Kai -- Specs: Length: 492 mm (19.4") Blade length: 334 mm (13.15") Blade max. width: 46 mm (1.81") Blade max. thickness: 8 mm (5/16") Hilt: 160 mm (6.3") weight: 598 g Last edited by kai; 3rd February 2019 at 11:15 PM. Reason: Adding specs... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello xasterix!
Quote:
Quote:
Any other examples that resemble this style, anyone? Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|