Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 15th April 2006, 01:58 AM   #8
azhreia
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivkin
...

As a result until 1820 or so all you can see de facto is that troopers were purchasing weapons according to their means and even to lesser extent according to their units - like palashes for cuirasiers and so on.
This is interesting.

it would presumably mean in my time period (1710-1711, after the disbandment of the Streltsy, during one of Peter The Great's periodic wars against the Turks), the officers, being mostly nobles, would have had fairly decent weapons, while the common soldiery would not necessarily have had as good weapons.

I'm still of the opinion that an officer of the cavalry would have been armed with a sword/sabre, dagger and musket pistol, even if the names I was given weren't the right ones for the time period. I'll also admit that I learned more about kindjal while I was trying to research when they started being used than I ever thought I would want to know. They seem like fascinating items, and the photos I found in threads in this forum were a great help in visualising what other sites only gave descriptions for.

Azh
azhreia is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.