Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th January 2019, 05:30 PM   #1
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
Default

Polished rayskin is OK for scabbards, it's fairly slick for a grip, the bumpy unpolished is better. Do older ones have large Chinese characters? None of mine does, but I only have a few. The blade just doesn't seem right somehow.
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 06:54 PM   #2
mariusgmioc
Member
 
mariusgmioc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kronckew
Polished rayskin is OK for scabbards, it's fairly slick for a grip, the bumpy unpolished is better.
Exactly!

All European and Japanese swords I have with rayskin hilts are unpolished.

I have seen polished rayskin grips on some Chinese swords but I have serious doubts about them.

Genuine antique Chinese fighting swords had generally wrapped textile grips.
mariusgmioc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 07:12 PM   #3
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mariusgmioc
I have seen polished rayskin grips on some Chinese swords but I have serious doubts about them.
I agree with you on that one
look at this one I have some serious doubts
Attached Images
 
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 07:34 PM   #4
mariusgmioc
Member
 
mariusgmioc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubur
I agree with you on that one
look at this one I have some serious doubts
Fake, decorative sword "antiquated." Square grip almost identical with scabbard. No traces of handling.
mariusgmioc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 07:13 PM   #5
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mariusgmioc
Genuine antique Chinese fighting swords had generally wrapped textile grips.
I disagree or let's say not always.
Look at this one, this is a model well known and prsent in many museums...
around 1900.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Kubur; 16th January 2019 at 07:38 PM.
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 07:43 PM   #6
mariusgmioc
Member
 
mariusgmioc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubur
I disagree or let's say not always.
Look at this one, this is a model well known and prsent in many museums...
around 1900.
Entirely diferent story! Yet, I suspect the grip is a later replacement but still atique.
mariusgmioc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 08:40 PM   #7
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
Default

My mid 19c Imperial era Dao: Probably from a Warlord's troops.
Attached Images
 
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2019, 07:11 PM   #8
Kubur
Member
 
Kubur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kronckew
Polished rayskin is OK for scabbards, it's fairly slick for a grip, the bumpy unpolished is better.
I agree fuly.
Kubur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.