1442 Barong

Robert · 10th January 2019, 05:23 AM

I was not aware that a shandigan blade required a sharpened top edge. I was going by the protrusion on the bottom of the blade next to the hilt and that the blade itself looked to have a double bevel. Here is a photo of one of the two examples I have in my collection. I do not believe that I have ever taken ones of the other, but if I have I will post a couple of it as well.

Best,
Robert

P.S.
Neither of the examples I have include a sharpened area (false edge) on the top of the blade as shown in Bill's last photo.

kai · 10th January 2019, 06:29 AM

Yup, Robert is correct: a shandigan does not need to have parts of the back of the blade sharpened!

Aside from the strong edge bevel, I‘d only look for a more or less distinct fuller between the bevel and the back of the blade.

Regards,
Kai

10th January 2019, 05:23 AM	#1
Robert EAAF Staff Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Centerville, Kansas Posts: 2,196	I was not aware that a shandigan blade required a sharpened top edge. I was going by the protrusion on the bottom of the blade next to the hilt and that the blade itself looked to have a double bevel. Here is a photo of one of the two examples I have in my collection. I do not believe that I have ever taken ones of the other, but if I have I will post a couple of it as well. Best, Robert P.S. Neither of the examples I have include a sharpened area (false edge) on the top of the blade as shown in Bill's last photo. Attached Images Last edited by Robert; 10th January 2019 at 05:48 AM.

10th January 2019, 06:29 AM	#2
kai Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 3,255	Yup, Robert is correct: a shandigan does not need to have parts of the back of the blade sharpened! Aside from the strong edge bevel, I‘d only look for a more or less distinct fuller between the bevel and the back of the blade. Regards, Kai