![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Nice barong Bill. I like the blade quite a bit, but i would not consider this a "shandigan" blade myself. Other's mileage may vary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
Quote:
David, just had a moment to comment. I would not all it a shandigan. I think this one is shandigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
I was not aware that a shandigan blade required a sharpened top edge. I was going by the protrusion on the bottom of the blade next to the hilt and that the blade itself looked to have a double bevel. Here is a photo of one of the two examples I have in my collection. I do not believe that I have ever taken ones of the other, but if I have I will post a couple of it as well.
Best, Robert P.S. Neither of the examples I have include a sharpened area (false edge) on the top of the blade as shown in Bill's last photo.
Last edited by Robert; 10th January 2019 at 05:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Yup, Robert is correct: a shandigan does not need to have parts of the back of the blade sharpened!
Aside from the strong edge bevel, I‘d only look for a more or less distinct fuller between the bevel and the back of the blade. Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|