Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 4th January 2019, 10:59 PM   #6
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Post

Hello Bill & Detlef,

Sorry for coming late to the party!

Bill, thanks for posting some more Batak pieces! Could you add data for blade length and (max.) thickness, please?


Quote:
This is as well a Toba Batak kalasan when we want to follow Volz.
Well, the name game is pretty tricky with most Batak stuff, especially since there are lots of local differences and so few early sources that document the old traditions before the cultural transformations. Moreover, Volz did not really explored the whole Toba region while noting that there are strong local differences. Even if the name kalasan was actually used in the Toba periphery when Volz visited, van der Tuuk does not mention this name for the Toba core area in his earlier dictionary. Anyway, the blades tend to be quite different between Toba and Karo; this one is Toba.

The fittings are also typical for the Toba core area.

If we go with the common collectors' terminology, I feel the label piso halasan is quite suitable for this piece (cp. Fig. 422 in AvZ).

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.