![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Re: wrapping.
I see what you are referring to: some LB scabbards have a purely decorative panel of tightly woven thin leather ribbons, often black and green ( see attached pics) . Yours has a segment of non-patterned wrapping of a single ribbon that is very loose. My guess, this was not a decoration, but just a way of binding the scabbard to strengthen it. Re. Anatolian yataghans. T-pommel is specific only for Zeibek yataghans from Bursa area. This is one of the few infrequent yataghan patterns that is specifically recognized as belonging to a specific group ( see my earlier post). The rest of Anatolian yataghans had garden variety ears. Regretfully, I cannot decipher the stamp. Moreover, I cannot recall any LB with a bladesmith's stamp. If they exist, they must be very unusual. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
|
![]()
Ariel, I’m just curious to see what else you have in collection, you have such a vast knowledge
![]() And the cartouche or the makers mark, i said was similar to those on kindjals or quaddaras and not on the LBs. PS: I greatly enjoy the Laz Yatagan I got from you! Thank you! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
|
![]()
An example
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
|
![]()
And coupes Black Sea knives with similar vowen leather scabbards
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 95
|
![]()
Your yatagan is probably from the Trabzon region.Not much to do with
![]() laz biçak / karadeniz yatağan. Here are some pictures of mine laz biçak. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Years ago , before it was established that those curious contraptions with fancifully curved blades and sharp horns for a pommel were coming from Lazistan, there were passionate arguments about their origin.
There were those who called them Egyptian, because the form of the blade was a dead ringer of an ancient Egyptian khopesh. Anthony Tirri maintained that they were Algerean, based on some features similar to flissa: very thin heedless-like point and semicircular or slanted heel of the blade. And there were some who paid attention to the black and green leather ribbons seen on some Sudanese/ Somali daggers. All these theories went the way of Dodo with the publication of photographs from Lazistan. Laz Bichaqs are easily recognized, with no similar examples known to man and beast. But let me agree with Osobist: let us assume that with a lot of imagination one can find some features on the Sphenoid’s yataghan that do resemble some features of Laz Bichaq. IMHO, no matter what, it does not and will not allow us to classify it as true LB. Weapons tend to borrow or inherently have some similarities with foreign examples. Some Tulwars have prominent false edges, but they are not Ottoman kilijes. Guardless Bukhara sabers are not Caucasian shashkas. And the weapon presented here is a yataghan, but not a Laz Bichaq, aka Black Sea Yataghan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
|
![]()
Ariel thank you for your response and I really appreciate your expertise and knowledge. I completely agree with your opinion. It’s not a Black Sea Yatagan or Laz Bichak or a Laz Yatagan some would call them. Perhaps it’s just a Yatagan from the area; a Yatagan from Black Sea ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|