Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 20th November 2018, 09:36 PM   #11
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helleri
Curvature in a blade is for:

1) Increasing the amount of edge contained within a length (A curved blade has more edge than a strait blade measured guard to tip in a strait line).

2) Increasing ability to absorb and redistribute shock from lateral or shear impact.

3) Decreasing the area of contact so as to magnify force (a reduction in area concentrates and amplifies force in the same way that a lens can gather light into a single more intense point).

When a blade is curved it looses some thrust efficiency. It also gains cutting efficiency. However the veins of the foiling on this blade would prevent the blade from making a through cut. That doesn't mean that it should have no cutting capacity. Push and pull cutting is a useful tactic in many combative forms. But the same increase in cutting efficiency can be achieved without sacrificing thrusting efficiency by profile tapering of a blade.

The foils get in the way of the curvature being effective for cutting. The curvature brings the tip off center-line and thus detracts from the foils ability to aid in thrusting. The design of the blade shows confusion. It doesn't know what it wants to be so it ends up not being particularly good at either mode of use (or at least not nearly as good as it could be in either capacity).

It's still cool looking. But I wouldn't want to take it into a fight over a blade that is better designed for doing one thing or the other. Or over a blade that uses tapering to be good at both things. Not all old weapons were necessarily well conceived. A maker might be really good at the technical aspects of constructing a blade but have no eye for practicality due to no combat experience. Or maybe they are deliberately departing from what is known to work as an experiment.

Not saying the blade isn't worth owning. Because of it's odd design it might be more worth owning. As it makes it a good conversation piece. A blade that shows how a blade should not be designed is as useful as one that shows what works the best for purpose in use.

Hello Helleri,

you are certainly correct but there a lot of similar styled blades like this, think only to khanjars.
And think about that you push a dagger not always in a straight line. I am not used in material arts so I only can guess.
Anyway, I like it and it will stay for some time in my collection.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.