![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Belgium
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Fabrice, you have a PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,262
|
I saw that recently on the auction site. Interesting, but it was live so I restrained myself from query/comment as that is not allowed here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Belgium
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
No problem, Fabrice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,708
|
Well handled Fernando. So is the item now open to discussion as no comments have been issued thus far, or does it remain restricted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Belgium
Posts: 52
|
Hello Kronckew,
Yes indeed it was in auction and I did not know that it was not advisable to present an object in the course of sale. I will not do it anymore and apologize to the administrators. I found this sword so interesting and original that I was tempted to present it for opinion. I have some swords from Flank officers and I thought there was a family look. Maybe now that it is no longer auction, can you give your opinion on this "interesting" piece? Kind regards |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|