Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 31st October 2018, 08:40 PM   #1
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
If I understand correctly mail was not issued to the rank and file masses, in fact it was an expensive commodity typically worn by the professional or hereditary warriors and higher echelon figures...
You mean to say that mail shirt, char-aina, helmets, bazubands and so on were exclusively for elite horse riders?
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2018, 08:50 PM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercenary
You mean to say that mail shirt, char-aina, helmets, bazubands and so on were exclusively for elite horse riders?


No not really, I meant that large numbers of 'rank and file' forces may have ranged from peasantry with little more than tools or implements, while numbers of others may have had all manner of captured or surplus equipment. While artwork suggests that things were like modern military and soldiers stood in line to receive 'government issue' goods that seems pretty infeasible given the cost and production demands for these kinds of equipment.
Jim McDougall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2018, 09:04 PM   #3
Mercenary
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
No not really, I meant that large numbers of 'rank and file' forces may have ranged from peasantry with little more than tools or implements, while numbers of others may have had all manner of captured or surplus equipment. While artwork suggests that things were like modern military and soldiers stood in line to receive 'government issue' goods that seems pretty infeasible given the cost and production demands for these kinds of equipment.
There were hired armies. And infantry were the least paid troops. The most part of them were peasants. There was no need to pierce mail everyday and possesed for it some kind of special "penetrating" daggers.

Last edited by Mercenary; 31st October 2018 at 09:28 PM.
Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.