![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
Kai,
I think the relative size of Moro weapons has as much to do with their being the weapons of seafarers and raiders, and to their stature, as much as a jungle environment. In period photos I am often surprised how Americans(supposedly shorter then than now) seem to tower over their Moro counterparts, say a datu and his entourage. Shorter blades are a characteristic of most SE Asian cultures, with some exceptions, and they are not all jungle dwellers, nor seafarers and raiders for that matter, so I think physical stature played crucial role in decisions about sword lengths. Even the kampillan, the longest of Moro swords, was capable of being welded with one or two hands. I know as a short guy myself I am more comfortable with a med-sized to smaller blade. Longer blades are awkward for me to handle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 674
|
![]()
Hi everyone. I'm not well-versed in Lumad weapons, but this is all I can do to help- been to the National Museum of Anthropology here in the Phils lately, this is what I saw. Apologies if I wasn't able to get all the labels.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 674
|
![]()
Hi everyone, I'm not well-versed in Lumad weapons, but this is what I can do to help- here are some pics from our National Museum of Anthropology.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 674
|
![]()
Greetings. While I'm not knowledgeable on Lumad weaponry, here are some pieces from the National Museum of Anthropology. Enjoy!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|