![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Thank you Alan, impressive collection of old pieces!
Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: East Java, Indonesia
Posts: 42
|
Than you all for the explanations.
Best regards, Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 428
|
Hello,
Among the mendaks I had in stock, I found four that have the right dimensions. The numbers 1 and 2 are copper and were formerly plated with silver. Number 3 is silver and number 4 is brass. In your opinion, which of his mendak is the best suitable with the rest of Keris? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
I'm thinking 4, or perhaps 3. Others may differ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Is the pendok truly brass? that is, yellow brass? Or is it mamas? an alloy like nickel silver/german silver/white brass.
If mamas, use #3, if yellow brass, use #4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: East Java, Indonesia
Posts: 42
|
Hi,
From the pictures, I prefer no. 4. In my opinion, mendak no. 4 is the most fit with the deder. Best regards, Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 428
|
So, the most suitable mendak is the n°4 (the pendok is yellow brass, but pale yellow).
Thank you all for your opinion.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|