![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,369
|
![]()
You do notice the lack of pamor on the metuk ?
This would signify to me that it is a separate piece from the spear blade . ![]() Please pardon my manipulation of your picture . DrD Last edited by Rick; 3rd April 2006 at 10:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,369
|
![]()
Isn't this a Mataram era piece David ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
![]()
Hi Rick
I do believe this is Mataram, with the potential of being even earlier. The age of the piece is probably best appreciated with it in hand, and the state of preservation is excellent. The dress is recent but appropriate to the piece. David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,369
|
![]()
It is really beautiful and has been well maintained .
The pamor control from what I can see is outstanding . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|