![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]()
Rob,
Was nice of Mr Domenech to respond - He is a real gentleman and a scholar! I forgot to ask in my earlier posts; Is there any evidence of the edge having been sharpened more than once or at all? Cheers Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 565
|
![]()
Hi Chris,
From the striations on the edge, it would appear that the blade has been sharpened with a stone. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 565
|
![]()
Hi Chris,
The edge isn't very sharp. It cut some paper drawn across it but didn't cut a piece of twine. I imagine that it is sharp enough if the blade was intended primarily as a point weapon. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 685
|
![]() Quote:
As a generalization, old bayonets make poor cutting knives because the steel was tempered to a lower hardness and the cross sectional geometry was less than optimal. As you say, they were primarily stabbing weapons. Cheers Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|