![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
![]()
I should have been a little more concise with my assessment.
I meant to add that the hilt replacement is old, not recent. The blade is just too nice for a plain unadorned hilt. I agree with CharlesS that this is pre 20th cent. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]() Quote:
kinda makes me wonder sometimes if what we think as plain is not so back in the days |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
![]()
Yeah, maybe. Yours hilt is finished compared to Gustav’s.
BTW did you get the panji? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
no, never heard back from the guy, lol. would've been sweet!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,469
|
![]() Quote:
In an earlier comment here I suggested that this was a sword used by a panglima. A panglima was employed by a Sultan as his military chief, perhaps the equivalent of a general in western armies. Elsewhere on this site it has been suggested that twist core blades on a kris were a sign of rank for the panglima. If so, some of these blades would have been for use as a weapon and perhaps some were for "show." Therefore, finding a rather plain hilt on a high quality twist core blade should not be uncommon or surprising if many of these were intended for "field use" rather than "parade swords." Ian. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|