Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27th March 2006, 04:27 PM   #7
B.I
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
Default

hi jens
am happy to defer to your theories, especially the date on seeing the pommel underside. i know the sword of course, but have a bad memory :-)
hendleys book is great (all of them, but the jeypore enamels that you refer to especially) but like egerton, he must be taken cautiosly. both he and egerton spent much time in india, studying a subject they were both obviously very passionate about, but neither spent much time in the south. also, both studied mainly the arts of the time, of course delving into the past where applicable. the south was never studied properly and only recently have many theories of the past been brough to task.
still, in saying that i am still happy to defer to your opinion, but would like to know where the rajesthan colours information came from (was this hendley?)
B.I is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.