![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,362
|
![]()
The pitting looks like the effect of old rust resulting from that area previously being covered with some decorative metal. The handle has likely been replaced on this one IMHO.
Ian. Last edited by Ian; 13th January 2018 at 04:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: France
Posts: 43
|
![]()
Oh yes for sure the handle has been replaced, this is why I was thinking to a restauration work !
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
|
![]()
Interesting that this item has a very similar profile to mine posted here
My thoughts on the pitting are that it could have been caused by rust that formed where the wood of the sheath may have trapped moisture against the blade. Although much of the hilt is covered by the sheath, it tightens against the blade right where yours shows pitting. If someone has since polished away the rust, it may well look like your example. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I agree that there is a lot of pitting, and that it does look like someone has "painted" (?) over the active rust.
When I restore pieces with this type of pitting, I try to get down as much as possible, but know that there will always be a certain amount of pitting left. The reason is that if you remove all of the pitting, there might not be much of a blade left or the blade will be too thin to be useful depending on how deep the pitting goes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 28
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|