![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Cathy,
I remain with the idea that such reciprocate mechanism was more intended to unfold that to fold... pass the preciosity. As if i was wandering on a fantasy when trying to decipher the attribution of the term "attack", HERE you have an interesting French description of the "garde tournante" in that, even not dominating the language, one may catch a pretty good idea of how english speaking collectors arrived at such term ... attack = combat. Roughly translating ... "The brass guard has two parts, from which one, swiveling, passes from normal position to combat position, by a simple 90º rotation". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 61
|
![]()
1796 Light Cavalry Officer's Sword with folding sideguard.
Blade is normal 1796 dimensions, and retains considerable bluing and gilding. Blade is signed "Osborn's Warranted". Scabbard has lost most of the gilding on it's mounts. Top chape is detached and has had the hanging ring broken off; is signed "Henry Osborn, Bordesly near Birmingham" Hilt is of gilt copper, pretty worn. The quillon is a restoration (and a little too straight). Original leather covered grip with wire wrap. The interesting feature is the hinged sideguard, ala the French "attack" guards. The facetted ferrule at the grip base has a knob protruding on the right side. The knob is connected to a blade that engages a slot on the hinged sideguard to lock it in place when extended. The spring inside the ferrule that activated the knob/blade is either broken or jammed, and the blade no longer engages the slot, so you can't lock the sideguard now. --ElJay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|