![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,274
|
![]()
Well, it was around noon, so maybe I was thinking "Big Mac,"..................seriously when I looked up Micmac, it appeared to be an acceptable entry as was Mi'kmaq; maybe Micmac is slang.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,231
|
![]() Quote:
I did find this example that doesn't seem to have any decorative carving like yours, but couldn't find much info on it beyond the image. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,274
|
![]()
I can not enlarge the picture, but the rootball does seem very similar to mine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 543
|
![]()
Hi
Just an observation. In your last picture there seems to be a hole in the centre with spiral rings around the hole, like you get when wood is being turned on a lathe. Are these spirals growth rings of the plant or made by a cutting implement Did native Americans use lathes? Regards Ken Last edited by Kmaddock; 13th December 2017 at 01:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,241
|
![]()
Does look like both ends have the centring hole and some concentric lathe-like centre marks. Wood lathes are really quite ancient, but not sure native Americans used them. (or Fijians
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,274
|
![]()
Great eyes guys.I noticed that too.The shaft is roughly shaped with crude knife marks, not those a lathe would leave and the shaft has flat areas not consistent with turning.One of the holes at the end is approx. 5/8" deep and I think that was made to hang the item on a wall; the other hole is very shallow and it could be consistent with mounting on a lathe.
In my opinion, it could be turned, but I don't think so. If it is turned, by a lathe, could it be a shillelagh or a WW1 trench club?The spikes on the ball struck me more as being a European attribute, rather than aboriginal? It still could end up being a very heavy, dangerous movie prop. Last edited by drac2k; 13th December 2017 at 01:59 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,231
|
![]()
Well, i see that hole as well, but there is no way you would get an object or a shaft shaped as irregularly as that if this were to have been turned on a lathe.
More likely someone had an attachment ring at the base of the club at some point. might not be an original feature, but added later by a collector. Hard to say. As was suggested earlier, identifying the wood could go a long way to determining the place of origin. You might want to travel that route. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
As a former lathe machinist I can clearly say, this club was not made with a lathe. The denotation "Micmac" is from german Wikipedia (The Mi’kmaq, also Míkmaq, Micmac or Mic-Mac (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi%E2%80%99kmaq)). Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,231
|
![]() Quote:
Until the 1980s, "Micmac" remained the most common spelling in English. Although still used, for example in Ethnologue, this spelling has fallen out of favour in recent years. Most scholarly publications now use the spelling Mi'kmaq, as preferred by the people. The media has adopted this spelling practice, acknowledging that the Mi'kmaq consider the spelling Micmac as "colonially tainted". The Mi'kmaq prefer to use one of the three current Mi'kmaq orthographies when writing the language. I prefer and encourage the use of the name that is preferred by the people themselves rather than one they consider to be "colonially tainted". ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|