![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]()
Hi Rick and Richard....you are both of course correct. I did not read Rick's post properly. I took it to say that he DID have an Omani in his vast collection........maybe he actually does but just can not remember it??
![]() Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
Rick,
These barrels have the same constriction of the bore well up from the breech. as far up as maybe 5-6" How and what they loaded with I have no clue. When I checked mine, although small bore of .50 or less, they still wanted to hold a couple of hundred brains of powder to fill this chamber! Try a long wire down the bore, as it may be just the constriction you are hitting. Stu, LOL! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]() Quote:
Well, I was partially mistaken. After further investigation here is what I've found so far: Running a wire in the vent hole, there is evidence of powder in the breech. From the muzzle end, there is some type of semi-soft cloth or other fabric about 3" from the breech. Twisting, my patch puller will get a hold on it, but it doesn't want to budge. Hmmmm. If there is a ball/projectile it would half to be behind this cloth/wad/material. I'll try a bit more with the patch puller. Next, I think I will try some boiling hot water or penetrating oil to see if it will soften the material. So far, I have not noticed a conctriction like on some Torador barrels. But you may be right. Just need to get that piece of material out. Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
I'm holding my breath, Rick!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]() Quote:
The bore is now clear. Used boiling water. Whatever was down there seems to have melted LOL ![]() ![]() Anyway, thanks for the tip. Just needs a bunch more cleaning now. Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 411
|
![]()
I would have said this barrel is set up in a modern version of the traditional Scinde stock. I have seen a number of these Scinde 'jezails' with this type of barrel. My suspicion is that these barrels, as you say, closely associated with Omani matchlocks, actually originate in Scinde.
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for your reply. Yes, the stock shape of this gun more reflects the stocks made for the Sindh guns. See below. My guess is that this was the stock style used as a pattern by the late builder. I seem to recall our beloved, Matchlock had posted a gun on the European Forum from the late 15th to early 16th Century that had the barrel near the muzzle end fluted similar to the Omani barrels. This might mean some type of very early European influence (?) It's just curious the only surviving specimens with this style of barrel are on Omani matchlocks. Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,632
|
![]() Quote:
LOL!!! No. I checked. I really don't have an Omani matchlock. LOL. However, I think I mentioned to you a while back that I discovered another Afghan jazail - that I had comepletely forgot about !! LOL So your suggestion was not without merit. LOL ![]() Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|