![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It is plain ugly and and no match with the blade or scabbard. The scabbard is of a later date than the blade. But the hilt must surely be a later addition again. Best regards, Willem |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,019
|
![]()
Yep.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
While I have not tested the metal yet, I tend to agree with everything that has been said here, that is:
* the blade is older than the rest * the scabbard is of better craftsmanship than the hilt * the hilt is the least attractive and likely the latest part of the sword, but specifically made for this sword These things pretty much confirm my original thoughts. Thanks for your input, gentlemen! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|