![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
no, not. But I want to show why I don't want to rule out Bicol. Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
This is really interesting, and I know little on Philippines weapons other than just comparative references and I would be torn between African and those archipelagos in Philippine regions.
However, for the hilt I think Detlef has shown compelling comparison for Bicolano, and the similarity is enough that subtle deviation might be attributed to artisan styling. As far as the blades, there is so much remounting of blades into local hilts and generational refurbishing I would think it would be hard to conclusively classify a weapon by focus on either component. The best we can estimate is possibly a proclivity to the hilt region as that is usually the determining factor as a local preference, while blades travelled considerably. Looking forward to what you guys, whose knowledge of these weapons is fascinating, will determine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,255
|
![]()
I think close-ups of the cleaned blade and the material that the handle is wrapped in will help in the determination of origin.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|