![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
While without a first-hand look it would be difficult to judge whether or not it is "touristy"...to me it seems to have some age regardless...I must tell you by Ovambo standards the knife is of average craftsmanship at best. Ovambo daggers are always rather simple but can be very elegant in design in both blade and scabbard. This one may well be a "working knife" and does not share the elegance the Ovambo are capable of in their blades.
Please, no offense intended, just an honest observation. Please see these examples: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Good authentic knife, not very old, perhaps 1930-1950
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: I live in Gordon's Bay, a village in the Western Cape Province in South Africa.
Posts: 126
|
![]()
Pieje, Charles & Bob, many thanks for your comments. Charles, no offense taken - we much prefer HO's, do we not?
Regards Johan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Charles is right that it isn't a good quality Ovambo knife. Seems to show some signs of use, but will probably be younger than I initially wrote. During the 50s and especially the 60s-70s quality strongly declined.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 443
|
![]() Quote:
It might not be pretty, but not everyone needs, or can afford, the top of the line. It may well be the sort of thing that is in regular use, but not seen as worth collecting. Even steel objects can be ephemeral. Preserving the artifacts of the common man is worthwhile, though not glamorous. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
I certainly did not intend to imply in my post that the knife was not worth collecting. I don't think any of us gets to judge that. I was merely trying to illustrate a 'range' of Ovambo work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|