![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
After a second look I think that A could be the front side. And I am sure that I have seen this what Rick decribe as pillar motive before, I need to check my collection for this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Have found it in a box where I keep a lot of different pendoks as spare parts. Not direct the same style but this pillars are present here as well. I ever have thought that my pendok is a Banyumas pendok but I could be wrong.
Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
The motif on Bejo's pendok and the motif on Detlef's pendok are not the same, nor similar, but are philosophically related.
Detlef's pendok has a motif that symbolises emerging life. At the top there is a butterfly, or moth, if we track this butterfly down to the beginning of the motif at the tip of the pendok, we will see that the butterfly has experienced a journey from chrysalis to grown beast with spread wings. This is a statement of the way in which life grows, something of particular importance to an agrarian based society. Bejo's motif is different. This one I do not know for certain, but a very highly regarded silver & gold smith who specialised in keris fittings and who lived in Solo once told me that in his opinion this angular upright was a stylization of the Kalpataru, the Tree of Life. I am inclined to accept this as an accurate opinion, because if we look at the literature on Indonesian art motifs we frequently see the Kalpataru represented in a very sparse, angular fashion. Detlef, I consider your pendok to be Banyumas. If we are both wrong, then a very great number of Javanese keris literate people will also be wrong. Bejo's pendok I'm a bit hesitant about, my inclination is to think of it as quite recent, say within the last 50 years, and made in the style of Banyumas, but in Jogja. Bejo, a question:- is your pendok silver, and if so, what is its weight? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: East Java, Indonesia
Posts: 42
|
Thank you for all the opinions. That really help me
![]() Quote:
Thank you, Best regards, Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Hello Alan,
and what you think is the front side from Bejos pendok? Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
I received from a friend a picture from another pendok in the same style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,417
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 369
|
Hi guys,
I don't know if it is normal for a North Coast Javanese pendok to have 2 design on each side with more or less similar level of workmanship. On Malay pendok usually the one on the back is less refined than the front. Is side B motif Javanese? Probably one motif was made earlier than the other? Regarding the side with "pillar" design, if I am not mistaken, according to Alan, it is symbolic of renewal of life. Here's a quote from Alan's previous catalogue, describing this motif "it shows the pupa of a dragonfly, progressing to its adult form. In Javanese symbolism, the dragonfly can be understood as a symbol related to the warrior, so the symbolism of this pendok is in fact closely related to extinction of, and renewal of life, a theme that is frequently found in Javanese art and thought." If we look closely, there's a motif that starts from the bottom of the pendok "making it's" way to the top of the pendok and it's size and refinement grows as it reaches the top. I provide an example of this motif below. Last edited by rasdan; 19th August 2017 at 11:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 369
|
I think my post above was posted at the same time as Alan and Detlief. Sorry if there is any confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Thanks for that Rasdan.
The dragonfly is probably better, because of the warrior connotation, but I have seen this motif interpreted as butterfly/moth also. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
I have no idea at all which side is supposed to be the front. When in doubt I fit the pendok to a suitable wrongko and see which way it sits correctly.
Bejo, I feel that your pendok is very probably old, 41gm is too light for a recent pendok, old silver pendoks were usually lighter than more recent ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Quote:
The 3 reasons wich make me feel that B is the front side are as follows: . To my eyes the embossed motif is more finely made on side B . The main motif is framed on side B unlike on side A . From the pics there seems to be more dark patina & wear near the bottom tip on side A My personal opinion only... Regards
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|