Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd July 2017, 08:12 AM   #1
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
Default

A post in the wrong hole.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2017, 08:16 AM   #2
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
Default

Its just experience Shadye.

+60 years worth.

That plus the fact that I've handled literally thousands of blades and have been taught by probably the best and most knowledgeable teachers of their generation, two of whom were Surakarta Karaton Empus.

There is a good Tuban blade shown in this thread, and Jean has shown a pic of one of the super-size Tuban blades:-

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=22862
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2017, 03:04 AM   #3
shayde78
Member
 
shayde78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
Default

Thanks again, AG.
I had found that turban thread too. Some properly beautiful examples.

There isn't much to provide scale in those pics...but it appears the blades have a more or less uniform lozenge-shaped cross section. That seems different from the piece in question, no? Could mine have been subjected to some serious stock removal?
shayde78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2017, 08:51 AM   #4
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
Default

How do you reckon this blade might have looked before it was carved with a naga, Shayde?

Whether it was carved from an old Tuban, or some other old, beefy blade, or whether it was forged with the intent of carving it with a naga, it is absolutely certain that the cross section was way different to what you can see now.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2017, 03:06 AM   #5
shayde78
Member
 
shayde78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
How do you reckon this blade might have looked before it was carved with a naga, Shayde?

Whether it was carved from an old Tuban, or some other old, beefy blade, or whether it was forged with the intent of carving it with a naga, it is absolutely certain that the cross section was way different to what you can see now.
I don't have an answer, other than to note the blade is now thin (compared to a tuban), so a great deal of material must have been removed. Seems like a loss
shayde78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2017, 04:59 AM   #6
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shayde78
Seems like a loss
Generally speaking it is...
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.