![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,020
|
Quote:
A very nice catch BTW. I like that dark jungayan pommel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
Kino,
Thanks for the input. Though Battara may very well be correct, I , like you, tend to lean in the direction of the clamp being tang related. The location of it is just too coincidental. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 968
|
This is a very nice kris and it reminds me of the one I presented recently in the details of the pattern-welding. I will be curious to learn the impressions of the membership about the origin and age of this kris.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
I acquired one of these krisses some years ago; albeit without the apparent tang repair. I have searched for the post without success; it could have been a brother to Charles' blade.
I have trouble understanding why a tang on a sword like this could break accidentally being something obviously created by a very talented smith. Possibly the damage was done by Colonial forces with an eye toward rendering it useless; but why not just confiscate the weapon instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,413
|
Hello Charles,
very nice catch! Congrats!! I think that we see a tang repair here, have a look to this old thread: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ight=moro+krisThis kris is now in my possession. Regarding the fuller I direct remember this one wich was recently sold by ebay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Kniv...p2047675.l2557 Also the pommel is very similar to yours. Best regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|