![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
I see, very heavy to wear though.
best, Jasper |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Owners necks would have to be stronger than those of Formula 1 pilots, due to G force
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,216
|
![]()
a lot of the weight would be distributed down to the rest of the armour and padding the helmet rested on and thus the shoulders took a lot of the burden. i think they and the rest of the armour were heavier as manning the walls didn't require the same mobility as on a battle field, and the extra thickness helped against missiles. if the enemy ever got over the walls and fighting became hand to hand, a lighter armour might be better. you could switch if you knew when they were going to make it over.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|