![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 126
|
Thanks, Jim, for your thoughts. I too had considered and dismissed 'Mounted Dragoons' for the same reasons, but I suppose a bit of tautology is not beyond the military mind and the sequence of elements (regiment-company/troop-rack number) would fit. As you say, an officer's sword would not be so marked so we could assume that a quality sword from c.1730 had come into the hands of a common soldier in a militia/fencible regiment (perhaps by inheritance) by 1780-90s. Interesting to ponder these things.
Neil |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Quote:
![]() Thank you for the patience and well shared thoughts . Jim |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|