![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,229
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 906
|
![]()
Yes, Thanks a lot for precious informations about Kanenori and the Mei !!
I have a last question because I'm not a specialist: I heard about industrial or semi industrial blade during this period, I think this one is a semi industrial, have you an idea what was the work of the blacksmith ? just inspecting the blade ? Polishing ? ( I don't think it is a forged Gendai blade , I see no hamon ) ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 329
|
![]()
A further superfluous information from "Military swords of Japan (1868-1945)" by Fuller and Gregory.
The explanation about figure vi reads: "Na or mei stamp. Very small and easily overlooked, this is probably a general inspection or acceptance stamp - as well as a Nagoya Arsenal firearms control stamp. Fairly common" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
Not sure what you mean by "industrial or semi-industrial". With the exception of the "top end" gendai smiths, most other Showa era blades (whether hand forged or not) were made in factory settings using production line methods (smith forges blade, someone else polishes it, yet others mount it, etc.).
IMHO, Kanenori falls into the latter catagory - probably hand forged, but not of tamehagane, and then passed on for polishing,mounting. Here's a page that may be of help. http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/showato.htm Rich |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|