![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2012 
				
				
				
					Posts: 470
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It is certainly a Persian shamshir. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The blade is inscribed in the upper cartouche, ABBAS SHAH BANDE-YE VILAYET, which was the title adopted by Shah Abbas I (r. 1588-1629) and used by shahs of Iran thereafter. The lower cartouche, depicting a lion, also bears the name ASSAD. This is a transitional signature discussed in my article, which Ibrahim kindly cited. The wootz pattern is evident in the photos. The guard is original. Though corroded, fine chiseling is evident. The grips are ivory, in Mamluk style, but may be Persian work as well. On cursory examination, it probably dates to the second half of the 18th or beginning of the 19th century.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2007 
				Location: Germany, Dortmund 
				
				
					Posts: 9,416
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Wow Oliver, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	great description! Agree with you and Marius about wootz, clearly visible. Agree also that the handle scales are from ivory as well that the guard would look beautiful after a very careful cleaning. It's a very nice sword which need a good and careful restoration. Regards, Detlef  | 
| 
		
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: What is still UK 
				
				
					Posts: 5,925
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Not so sure about the rather fresh looking file marks on the handle.  I think it has been through repair restoration and replacement.
		 
		
		
		
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2008 
				Location: Poole England 
				
				
					Posts: 443
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks for the information everyone.  As I said, not my sphere of collecting so all of this is very helpfull. 
		
		
		
			I had not thought that the grips are ivory as I could not see any obvious schreger lines. One of the new photos, of the end of the pommel does look more like ivory now I have looked more closely. Tim, I cannot account for the file marks, but if you look at the new photos, I do not think anything about the hilt could be called "fresh" I don't think the grips have been off for a while. If it has been restored and replaced it looks as though it was a good while ago. Thanks again Roy  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 3,255
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hello Roy, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	the blade looks pattern-welded to me, not wootz. Anyway, it is quality work AFAIK... Regards, Kai  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Oct 2007 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,818
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Its a very nice old Persian blade mounted in English hilt to my eyes.  I can't point out anything else which has not already been mentioned. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Richard Delar might chime in here as there is a well written discourse on The English Mameluke Cavalry Officers sword. Gavin  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2012 
				
				
				
					Posts: 470
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Not only is it wootz, but the last photo above clearly suggests a ladder pattern.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |