Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st January 2017, 10:01 PM   #1
Miqueleter
Member
 
Miqueleter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern California
Posts: 39
Default

My 2 cents worth. I agree 100% with K's #33 post. As you said, the man knows his miquelets.
Miqueleter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2017, 10:43 PM   #2
machinist
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 93
Default

Well that was informative, thanks to both of you Fernando, and Fernando K!
machinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2017, 08:38 PM   #3
dana_w
Member
 
dana_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
Default

I've removed the lock to check for additional markings. Unfortunately, there are none.

For clarity on this particular Miquelet Lock, I offer these additional photos.
Attached Images
  
dana_w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2017, 08:46 PM   #4
dana_w
Member
 
dana_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miqueleter
My 2 cents worth. I agree 100% with K's #33 post. As you said, the man knows his miquelets.

Always nice to hear from you too Miqueleter.
dana_w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2017, 11:04 PM   #5
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
Default

Hello everyone

Although the lock does not have any inscription, it shows an excellent work in its realization and even the engraving of is of quality

Thanks to Dana for the photos

Affectionately. Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2017, 12:15 PM   #6
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

I assume my limitation and confess my difficulty in discerning some technical details between the various lock variations. This is agravated by the lexicon applied by Fernando K being subject to engine translation ... not the best for converting technical terms. If i try to figure out the meaning of the expression 'bowl with its built bridle', i realize this means 'frizzen fixed in the pan', a detail i find too subtle to distinguish by myself when i look at the different versions; perhaps more visible if i saw these differences well signaled...
But what i think i discern with certainty is how the frizzen spring is situated 'above' or 'in front' of the main spring which, being the Armeria Real example considered correct by Fernando K, doesn't however correspond to that of Dana's example, both assumed as being part of the tres modas version. Would it be that, as Calvo (and not only) notes, Miquelete variants classification is somehow discussable ...

.
Attached Images
  
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2017, 02:18 PM   #7
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Speaking of patilla lock variations, and if Dana doesn't mind, i here upload an example of Portuguese 'patilha de invenção' lock, made by master Bartholomeu Gomes, dated 1781.

.
Attached Images
 
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2017, 02:25 PM   #8
dana_w
Member
 
dana_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Speaking of patilla lock variations, and if Dana doesn't mind, i here upload an example of Portuguese 'patilha de invenção' lock, made by master Bartholomeu Gomes, dated 1781.
I certainly don't mind fernando. Collectively we have access to many wonderful examples of Miquelet Lock styles. The forum gives us a good opportunity to examine any unique differences.
dana_w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2017, 02:25 PM   #9
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
Default

Hola, tocayo

A pesar de las dificultadees de la traducion, respondo a tu inquietud

Primero. La gran diferencia con la llave "a las tres modas" esta en la brida del rastrillo, que en el miquelete es postiza (debajo de la calzoleta) y en la llave a la tres modas, como en la llave francesa, la brida forma parte integral de la cazoleta (Estrivillo, dice el documento del Palacio reproducido por LAVIN)

Segundo. El resorte del rastrillo esta a la vista, y no oculto como en el miquelete, debajo de la brida y oculto por este, y el vetice apunta en la misma direccion que el resorte mayor, y no como en el miquelte, que tiene el vetice hacia el pie de gato y el extremo aapuntando al extremo delantero de la platina. El echo de que el resorte del rastrillo este situado arriba o delante del resorte mayor, es intrascendente, y depende del constructor de la llave, y del largo que le quiso dar a la platina de la llave.

Tercero. A veces, el resorte no es plegado, sino que es curvo, como sucede en algunos ejemplares de miquelete, pero sigue estando a la vista (aunque la cazoleta tenga una brida postiza, como en ejemplar mostrado por Calvo) pero sigue la misma orientacion que en la llave a la romana

Cuarto Se puede notar que la posicion del calzo de media monta difiere en los dos ejemplares, pero no es definitorio.

Creo que es todo

Un anrazo. Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.