![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]() Quote:
For the reference, you may see the complete publication HERE |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,200
|
![]()
Alex,
Thank you so much for the excellent supportive information on this knife, and especially for this fantastic link!!! This is great to add to resources on punch marks.........very much appreciated. All the best Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]()
Jim, Alex, thank you!
Punchmarks = indicators of quality looks quite convincing Look at this sickle of the same period and from the same region - it bears three similar marks: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Evgeny, the same conclusion about these marks was reached by several collectors of similar items that were discovered in Austria, which Styria was/is part of. It is hard to judge the quality of relic blades, but some correlation between number of marks, quality and/or complexity of production or construction can be noticed, so the theory remains plausible.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|