![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Hi this is not from borneo it is a malay weapon the parang nabur is also a malay weapon that was also used by the seadayaks so not (home made)from borneo
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Ben,
By "Malay weapon" do you also include the Philippines as a possible place of origin? I fully agree that it doesn't look like made in Borneo. But I don't think it looks like made in other parts of Indonesia or Malaysia either. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
This just arrived today
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I have been confused by these puppies. However, Erik Farrow has this to say about this type being Visayan:
http://www.eriksedge.com/PH189.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
I agree with Erik that these swords are made in the Philippines, but looking at the blade profile... is it Visayan? I do not believe that Erik makes a direct reference to the sword being Visayan.
If indeed it is Visayan, there should be many other examples of this blade type in the Visayan region... I have not seen any. The closest examples to this sword are Parang Naburs. I think the sword presents a bit of a puzzle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
YOu have a good point BSMStar (like the on top of my head
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
The discussion of this sword actually continued in this thread.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...?t=1792&page=3 Batangas was brought up as a probable origin of this, by Stone, incorrect labeled sword. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|