![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
Definitely not Japanese.
Rich The Japanese Sword Index http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/nihonto.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 132
|
![]()
I agree, these look very much like Chinese copies/fakes..
Also, it would be strange to have an identical (serial)number on both blades.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,789
|
![]()
A point of history here, relating to your opening comments. The Kamakazi were not in operation until late in WW2...certainly not at Pearl Harbour.
As to the authenticity of the swords I leave that to much more informed collectors in this field. Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Definitely chinese fakes. I've seen them here in auction houses regularly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
Yep, no doubts about them.
Chinese fakes. And very poor quality fakes. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 24
|
![]()
Thanks so much for the information.
I gave to stretch ... Topic is closed. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Don't be disapointed too much. We all here on the forum have a corner at the attick we don't like to visit too much.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|