|
|
|
7th August 2016, 09:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
In fact, "psevdoshashka" is not the correct term. Correct to say - "Afghan shashka". We're talking "Bukhara shashka". "Pseudo" - is something unfinished. Afghan shashka - shashka by all indications.
|
|
|
|
8th August 2016, 12:04 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
8th August 2016, 04:42 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
 Lebedinsky coined the term "psevdoshashka", knowing very little about those items. Meanwhile, Afghan shashka - a shashka on all grounds."The double standard"? We're talking about "" Bukhara shashka". Why no one says it - "psevdoshashka"? She does not look like a Caucasian shashka. It does not bother anyone Afghan shashka we seek to be called -" psevdoshashka". Where is the logic? One might think that there is no term "Karud" or use the term "psevdoshashka", remaining at the beginning - the mid-20th century. Can "hide one's head in the sand". And it is possible to generalize the available data, to think (and not only use books Lebedinsky and Stone) and deal with complex issues. Good read other people's books. But it is even better think independently. Last edited by mahratt; 8th August 2016 at 05:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
