Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 5th August 2016, 12:47 PM   #3
Maurice
Member
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Green
It's been quite a while since there are any posts on mandaus and related blades...

Here is one I obtained very recently. I was told that this is strictly not refered to as mandau but parang nyabur. And it is made by the Ibans of Serawak instead of the 'orang ulu (Kenyah/kayan) that make the typical mandaus/parang ihlang.

The blade is curved upward which is a charateristic of nyabur but I'm not sure if it is really is a nyabur. The blade is simple and flat on both sides and with no decorations apart from at the base with small brass inlays and the ' half hook' at the bottom.

The scabbard looks relatively new and in good condition. The hilt looks good to my untrained eyes and has a nice owl like creature .
Appreciate any comments with regards to what type, age etc.

Thanks in advance.
Hi,

This is not a parang Nyabor. A Nyabor has a totally different kind of blade.
I attached a photo of a Nyabor blade from my personal collection, which is typical for a Nyabor.
It is not the upward curve which should be typical for a Nyabor, as there are more kind of different Borneo blades with upward curves. It is the combination with the "fingerguard" called "kundieng" and the space before the "kundieng" is thick and rounded or polygonal in section.

I agree the blade is not a mandau blade, as than it would be convex and concave, which does not seem to be the case looking at your photos.
I do agree that it is from the Sarawak tribes.
How thick is the blade at the spine at the base just after the hilt?

The sheath indeed is new, and they did a lot of effords having to look it old. The patina unfortunately is not right as one sees on the oldies, as well of the wood as the antler/bone carvings.

The hilt is also which I am sceptical about IMO. For sure the wrapping at the handle had been done later.

Best regards,
Maurice
Attached Images
 
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.