|  | 
|  15th July 2016, 03:12 PM | #22 | |
| Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Austria 
					Posts: 1,912
				 |   Quote: 
 And we are collectors of weapons, not etnographs to talk about the broader cultural influeces and about the "Inndo-Persian" culture. In our field, when somebody talks about a typical Indian Khanda and refers to it as being Indo-Persian is doing nothing but creating ambiguity. I certainly understand calling Indo-Persian a Shamshir with an "Assadullah" blade and a Tulwar hilt, or a Pesh-kabz bearing the traits of both Persian and Indian workmanship, but as I said in my original posting, I think the use of the term is abused, for the sake of "political correctness"... or in other words, just to be on the safe side.   | |
|   |   | 
| 
 | 
 |