Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19th June 2016, 09:59 AM   #1
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 413
Default

Hello Messia,
Dear All,

I have taken some detailed pictures of the pitting of this dagger and added a sword pommel , that has in my view has the same kind of pitting.
Does anyone have a different view or do we see similar pitting in all pics.
Just added a blade with different more profound pitting.

Thanks in advance for your comments

Ulfberth
Attached Images
      

Last edited by ulfberth; 19th June 2016 at 10:24 AM.
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2016, 04:12 PM   #2
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
Default

A similar mark is also reported to be on a 17th century rapier and the breastplate of a Maximilian armour, both from the former collection of Karl Gimbel. A strange assortment...
Attached Images
    
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2016, 09:07 AM   #3
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
Default

Here is one I have in my picture archive. I think that the one in question is an original antique piece and very nice!

Regards,
Detlef
Attached Images
 
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2016, 01:30 PM   #4
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

The really old ones were orders of magnitude more elaborate and artistic.
The one in question IMHO is most likely early-mid 20 century. Except for some pitting it has no signs of age. Might have been kept un-oiled: corrosion sets fast.
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2016, 01:50 PM   #5
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel
The really old ones were orders of magnitude more elaborate and artistic.
The one in question IMHO is most likely early-mid 20 century. Except for some pitting it has no signs of age. Might have been kept un-oiled: corrosion sets fast.

Hello Ariel,

I am by far not an expert by this daggers but the attached ivory at the ears look very old to my eyes and not like 20 century ivory. And look at the piece in up from post #5 Roland has posted, this piece isn't as well not very elaborate and artistic but since it seems to be a museum piece clearly antique.

Regards,
Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2016, 03:14 PM   #6
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

OK, let's date it to the 19th century:-)

Even then such dagger would be a replica.
The real ones were out of commission by the 16th century, but replicas were made all the time.
https://myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=22689

I am with Roland.
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2016, 09:52 PM   #7
Timo Nieminen
Member
 
Timo Nieminen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
Default

When did acid-etching such as on this dagger start being used to decorate weapons like this?

Common in the 19th century for sure. I have 19th century blades with similar corrosion, so I think 19th century replica fits the appearance.
Timo Nieminen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.