Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 3rd February 2006, 04:40 PM   #10
Jens Nordlunde
Member
 
Jens Nordlunde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
Default

Hi Fearn,

Thank you for the link, which I found very interesting, as I have never seen the history of swords described so well in such a little space.
My question is not, ‘is one sword better than the other?’
It is more in the direction, ‘when did the curved sword start to be used, and why - due to the stress of the impact, or why?’
The author gave part of the answer when he wrote, ‘when they started to fight from a horse’ (quoted from memory).
The Vikings mostly rode to the battlefield, got off the horse and started fighting.
The early horse fighters used bows, and had a sword as a second weapon – if they had any sword, but as the author is concentrating on swords, we can forget about this part. When the swords started to be one of the main weapons, they started, to be more or less curved, due to the way of fighting, and to the cutting effect fighting another man on horse, even a standing man, but, and this is interesting, when the man was laying down he was difficult to reach – so the cavalry sword got straight again.
Jens Nordlunde is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.