![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]()
Hi Messia,
The state of corrosion seems natural to me. Otherwise it is the very best artificial aging I ever saw. I don't believe in artificial aging, because it would be pretty unusual for european blades. It also make no sense, to age the blade but not the hilt. I tend to believe it is a 19th century work. If you can find traces of laminating, the blade could be from 15th century. But this is almost impossible to judge from the pictures only. I added two pictures of genuine ear daggers. They are a clear evidence, that one cannot judge the age of a blade from its state of corrosion! Roland |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,226
|
![]()
I found the mark on the blade in " Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde". But it might be difficult to decide wether it is an original mark or a fake............
corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
|
![]() Quote:
Solothurn Philadelphia |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 412
|
![]()
Hello Messia,
Dear All, I have taken some detailed pictures of the pitting of this dagger and added a sword pommel , that has in my view has the same kind of pitting. Does anyone have a different view or do we see similar pitting in all pics. Just added a blade with different more profound pitting. Thanks in advance for your comments Ulfberth Last edited by ulfberth; 19th June 2016 at 10:24 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
|
![]()
A similar mark is also reported to be on a 17th century rapier and the breastplate of a Maximilian armour, both from the former collection of Karl Gimbel. A strange assortment...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]()
Here is one I have in my picture archive. I think that the one in question is an original antique piece and very nice!
![]() Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|