Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17th June 2016, 10:37 AM   #1
messia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSinTX
In my opinion, I think it's a modern build with imitation ageing applied.
after this photos are not changed for your opinion?
messia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2016, 12:56 PM   #2
Roland_M
Member
 
Roland_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
Default

Hi Messia,


The state of corrosion seems natural to me. Otherwise it is the very best artificial aging I ever saw. I don't believe in artificial aging, because it would be pretty unusual for european blades.
It also make no sense, to age the blade but not the hilt.
I tend to believe it is a 19th century work.

If you can find traces of laminating, the blade could be from 15th century. But this is almost impossible to judge from the pictures only.

I added two pictures of genuine ear daggers.

They are a clear evidence, that one cannot judge the age of a blade from its state of corrosion!


Roland
Attached Images
  
Roland_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2016, 02:23 PM   #3
corrado26
Member
 
corrado26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,226
Default

I found the mark on the blade in " Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde". But it might be difficult to decide wether it is an original mark or a fake............
corrado26
Attached Images
 
corrado26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2016, 04:28 PM   #4
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corrado26
I found the mark on the blade in " Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde". But it might be difficult to decide wether it is an original mark or a fake............
This mark (or one very close to it) definitely appears on a few halberds... is that the context that Boeheim gives? Cannot say that I have seen it on a dagger before.

Solothurn
Philadelphia
Attached Images
  
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2016, 09:59 AM   #5
ulfberth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 412
Default

Hello Messia,
Dear All,

I have taken some detailed pictures of the pitting of this dagger and added a sword pommel , that has in my view has the same kind of pitting.
Does anyone have a different view or do we see similar pitting in all pics.
Just added a blade with different more profound pitting.

Thanks in advance for your comments

Ulfberth
Attached Images
      

Last edited by ulfberth; 19th June 2016 at 10:24 AM.
ulfberth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2016, 04:12 PM   #6
Reventlov
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 138
Default

A similar mark is also reported to be on a 17th century rapier and the breastplate of a Maximilian armour, both from the former collection of Karl Gimbel. A strange assortment...
Attached Images
    
Reventlov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2016, 09:07 AM   #7
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
Default

Here is one I have in my picture archive. I think that the one in question is an original antique piece and very nice!

Regards,
Detlef
Attached Images
 
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.