Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd May 2016, 06:50 PM   #1
Raymond
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 10
Default

Well let us see if I've got the pic thing right.
Attached Images
  
Raymond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2016, 11:15 PM   #2
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 671
Default

Hello

This is not a French conversion, but a flintlock pistol, copy the French model, and is converted back to percusiom such Italian time (kingdom of Piedmont)

Affectionately. Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2016, 07:32 AM   #3
corrado26
Member
 
corrado26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,226
Default

Sorry Fernando, but I have to contradict: This typ of conversion is certainly not made in Piemont but at Liège as is the cock which is typically Liège made. See pictures of a Liège made pistol M 1816/38UM.
corrado26
Attached Images
    
corrado26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2016, 02:18 PM   #4
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
Default

The proof mark is from Liege and was utilized from 1846 to 1893.
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2016, 02:23 PM   #5
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

That's the mark in the pistol posted by Corrado, not the example of this thread, posted by Raymond, right ? .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2016, 02:55 PM   #6
corrado26
Member
 
corrado26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,226
Default

That's right. This pistol M 1816/38UM with ramrod was made for the heavy Belgium cavalry, whereas the same pistol without a ramrod was made for the light cavalry. The "ELG" mark was by the way used from 1810 to 1897
corrado26
Attached Images
 
corrado26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 01:17 AM   #7
Raymond
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 10
Default

Hi Fernando, Corrado26 and GIO,

Got some good information from you gentlemen.

Thank you!


Am I correct in saying that this is ( probably) a Belgian Heavy Cavalry Pistol circa 1816 - 18?? converted from a Belgian copy of the An XIII?

I can see a sanded off (?) part of the barrel where the Leige proof could have been. Alas, it is only a blur.


Thanks again!

Ray

Last edited by fernando; 24th May 2016 at 10:03 AM. Reason: No appraisals allowed in discussion forum
Raymond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 11:39 AM   #8
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
That's the mark in the pistol posted by Corrado, not the example of this thread, posted by Raymond, right ? .
Yes, Fernando. Sorry for not having been clear.
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2016, 12:00 PM   #9
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.