![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Rick,
As a layered/laminated steel, it is a mechanical Damascus in a way, but not a typical one. There's no methodical attempt to manipulate steel into a particular pattern. This is a random mix, and the result of impurities that happened to be. There are many blades like this, especially Ottoman blades because they used all sorts of different types of steel. not all were designed or supposed to be etched. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
Can you explain please, what you try to say with " result of impurities"? This blade is completely flawless and very controlled forged. Each side has its own pattern. One must see the steel with his own eyes to understand the construction. My pictures are definitely not detailed enough. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
Good question, Roland
I may used the term "impurities" incorrectly as your blade shows some linear layering - a form of deliberate mechanical manipulation of different steels. Please see THIS POST for better example of what I meant by "impurities", i.e. pattern that is not formed intentionally. As you know, true wootz is a result of different impurities that were part of the ore, not added/manipulated to form the (mechanical) pattern. With examples above, the pattern is formed due to different steels used in the mix. Question to metallurgists: does the fact that "Each side has its own pattern" indicate accidental/random pattern formation, any particular technique, etc? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|